First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

S.C. newspaper sues police for access to 911 tapes

By The Associated Press
07.10.01

CHARLESTON, S.C. — The (Charleston) Post and Courier has sued the North Charleston Police Department after the agency denied the paper's request for 911 and dispatch tapes in a police shooting.

The lawsuit was filed yesterday.

Prosecutor Ralph Hoisington last month said he would not to file criminal charges against two white police officers accused of shooting a black man to death.

After Hoisington's decision, The Post and Courier requested a copy of the 911 and dispatch tapes under the state's Freedom of Information Act.

The city denied the request for the tapes, saying that Hoisington considered them evidence in the pending trial of four other men charged with lynching in connection with the case.

"Because I believe it is essential for law enforcement agencies to be consistent with the prosecuting authorities, the city takes the position that the tapes are exempt from production under the FOIA," North Charleston City Attorney Brady Hair wrote in a letter denying the newspaper's request.

Edward Snowden, 35, was killed in October by two North Charleston police officers responding to a fight in the parking lot of a video store.

The officers were called after four white men allegedly attacked Snowden, who was black. Snowden was carrying a gun when police arrived. He was shot seconds later. Four men have been charged with second-degree lynching — the charge for mob violence — in connection with the case.

The FOIA allows law enforcement agencies to withhold some records under four specific exemptions, if releasing them will harm the agency, according to the "Public Official's Guide to Compliance with South Carolina's Freedom of Information Act" published by the attorney general's office.

The newspaper's lawsuit says the tape recordings are public records and the city's denial did not say how releasing them would harm the police department, a requirement under the FOIA exemptions.

The tapes can be obtained through discovery by the defendants in the lynching cases, "so it is difficult to understand how disclosure of the tape recording will cause harm" to the North Charleston Police Department, the suit said.

There also was no prospective law enforcement action involving the tapes since officers did not face prosecution on any criminal charges and the four men have been indicted, the lawsuit said.

"It is important to this community that the public be as fully informed about those events as possible," said Barbara Williams, the newspaper's executive editor. "The Post and Courier does not believe there is any valid reason to keep the information on these tapes, which we believe strongly to be public records, away from the public."


Update
S.C. appeals court: Prosecutor was right to withhold 911 tapes
Panel rules against newspaper, saying recordings were exempt from open-records law because they were going to be used at trial. 11.18.03

Related

Ruling says police can release transcript instead of 911 tape

Arizona Court of Appeals holds that sometimes privacy concerns outweigh presumption of open records. 03.29.02

N.J. judge rules 911 tapes are public record

Press groups say ruling is first in state dealing with public's right to listen to recorded emergency calls. 04.09.02

News-media advocates criticize S.C. police for withholding data
Law enforcement officials say they're protecting privacy, but they also may be keeping critical information from public, says press group's executive director. 12.04.08

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Tuesday, September 7, 2010 | 12:17:32
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
1 for All
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Singsā„¢
Events
Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links